Re: [HACKERS] Improve catcache/syscache performance.
От | amul sul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Improve catcache/syscache performance. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAJ_b97yLQu6xYV+fHcOac-fy9i1ELPrVrVGe1bBE-hRxedi2A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Improve catcache/syscache performance. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,
On 2017-09-20 18:26:50 +0530, amul sul wrote:
> Patch 0007:
> Other than these concern, patch looks pretty reasonable to me.
I'd appreciate if you could have a look at the new version as well.
I have reviewed
the newer version, looks good to me.
Here are the few cosmetic comments for the 0003 patch:1
.
982 + ct->tuple.t_data = (HeapTupleHeader)
983 + MAXALIGN(((char *) ct) + sizeof(CatCTup));
It would be nice if you add a comment for this address alignment
.
2
.
947 /*
948 - * If there are any out-of-line toasted fields in the tuple, expand them
949 - * in-line. This saves cycles during later use of the catcache entry, and
950 - * also protects us against the possibility of the toast tuples being
951 - * freed before we attempt to fetch them, in case of something using a
952 - * slightly stale catcache entry.
953 */
Empty comment block left in the CatalogCacheCreateEntry().
3
.
411 +/* 412 + * CatalogCacheCompareTuple
413 + *
414 + * Compare a tuple to the passed arguments.
415 + */
416 +static inline bool
417 +CatalogCacheCompareTuple( const CatCache *cache, int nkeys,
418 + const Datum *cachekeys,
419 + const Datum *searchkeys)
Need an adjust to the p
rolog comment.
Regards,
Amul
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: