Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amul Sul
Тема Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY
Дата
Msg-id CAAJ_b96MS2WwoKFJbvP55_XqTOQqUWJo_Zi08EfsfnqQ0USvsw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY
Список pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 6:23 AM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a quick look at the latest 0001 patch, the following hunk to reset leftover
> flags seems to be unnecessary:
>
> + /*
> + * If some barrier types were not successfully absorbed, we will have
> + * to try again later.
> + */
> + if (!success)
> + {
> + ResetProcSignalBarrierBits(flags);
> + return;
> + }
>
> When the ProcessBarrierPlaceholder() function returns false without an error,
> that barrier flag gets reset within the while loop.  The case when it has an
> error, the rest of the flags get reset in the catch block.  Correct me if I am
> missing something here.

Good catch. I think you're right. Do you want to update accordingly?

Sure, Ill update that. Thanks for the confirmation.


Andres, do you like the new loop better?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matthias van de Meent
Дата:
Сообщение: [patch] CLUSTER blocks scanned progress reporting
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables