Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dennis Jenkins
Тема Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for?
Дата
Msg-id CAAEzAp8PpDur=kVrPZYmbJxUTrMLEA0w3Y7bUXZwJz_oYMD-Aw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for?
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> writes:
> On 22 May 2015 at 04:46, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote:
>> With all that being said, if I were to build a patch, would it be likely
>> to be accepted into core?


How feasible would it be to write a network proxy, like pg_bouncer, to handle converting the values on the fly, so that you need to change neither your original code base (with respect to this issue), nor change PostgreSQL itself?

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gilles Darold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: date with month and year
Следующее
От: Bill Moran
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for?