Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past
От | Alexander Farber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAADeyWinVfn3oHxik3-KiV7wkWq+OvSCwcmX60NAqxSB_GEOkA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Verifying a timestamp is null or in the past
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Awesome advices here. Thank you and happy new year. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote: > select 1 from pref_users where id=_from and vip > current_timestamp + interval '1 week'; > > if not found then > return; > end if; > > "found" is a special pl/psql keyword that tells whether the last query returned any results or not. Using that you canget rid of the entire declare-block in your function ;) > > Originally I tacked a "vip is not null or" before the check in the where-clause, but that's unnecessary - if vip is null,then the expression also evaluates to null and the where-clause will treat it as false. That's one of the peculiaritiesof SQL... For posterity's sake it may be better to add that part to the query anyway, that's up to personalpreference: > > select 1 from pref_users where id=_from and (vip is not null or vip > current_timestamp + interval '1 week');
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: