Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan
От | Yasir |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA9OW9dLo34sT7xE1fA_fncs-J2e+qAC3dkCKs=zynmLQVt3qg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 1:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Yasir <yasir.hussain.shah@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I forgot to mention a third problem, which is that reassigning the
>> alias during subquery pullup means it doesn't happen if subquery
>> pullup doesn't happen.
> Yes, that is by design.
By design? How can you claim that's not a bug? The alias(es)
associated with a VALUES clause surely should not vary depending
on whether the clause includes a volatile function --- not to
mention other unobvious reasons for flattening to happen or not.
By design of my solution, I was not taking it as a bug. But now, I agree with your opinion.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: