Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
От | Sami Imseih |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA5RZ0vji6CcbHdZCUm0P6S4oKb9T=5MViZ=wCcpHKyx-ijPcw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum (Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > I wonder if we could be even more granular > > > > for the "normal autovacuum" case and point to the reason the table was > > > > chosen. For example, was it the insert threshold, the update/delete > > > > threshold, etc.? > > > > > > Sounds like reasonable information. I guess we might want to have such > > > information in a cumulative statistics view but do you think it's > > > better to have it in a dynamic statistics view? > > > > +1 for this information in cumulative stats, on a per table level for sure. > > I do think however the pg_stat_all_tables views is getting too wide > > and moving new relation vacuum stats to a separate stats view will > > be very useful. > > Thanks for the discussion. > > IIUC are you suggesting I add such a last_autovacuum_reason column to > pg_stat_all_tables, which would be populated with one of the following > values? > - autovacuum_vacuum_threshold > - autovacuum_vacuum_insert_threshold > - autovacuum_freeze_max_age > - autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age This should be a separate discussion. But, I would think the counters will be n_aggressive, n_wraparound and n_failsafe. We need to separate aggressive and wraparound due to what is mentioned in vacuumlazy.c /* * While it's possible for a VACUUM to be both is_wraparound * and !aggressive, that's just a corner-case -- is_wraparound * implies aggressive. Produce distinct output for the corner * case all the same, just in case. */ A normal vacuum is the difference of autovacuum_count and the total of these counters. -- Sami Imseih Amazon Web Services (AWS)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: