> After a bit of fooling around I found that using an explicit \n
> instead of ^ fixes it. Not the world's most idiomatic regex,
> but it'll do. Will push the attached shortly.
I can also confirm this works as expected, although I feel my
suggested expression [0] is easier to understand, but I have no
strong opinion either way.
Regards,
--
Sami
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0tz-AibaxVF1NnNMcMEmwut%2Bkn%3Dk%3DxG2XmDN9d6kv2-%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com