Re: [Proposal] Adding callback support for custom statistics kinds

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sami Imseih
Тема Re: [Proposal] Adding callback support for custom statistics kinds
Дата
Msg-id CAA5RZ0swDCK+7M2KQip0tqUsBK3LUHd3F0ytpsKdDCfygHksKg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Proposal] Adding callback support for custom statistics kinds  (Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [Proposal] Adding callback support for custom statistics kinds
Список pgsql-hackers
> IIUC, if *any* error occurs outside of a deserialize callback, first the "error"
> code will be called, followed by "done" which will then trigger the
> end_extra_stats
> callback that will perform the cleanup.

That is true. But problem is, without an error indication, end_extra_stats(STATS_READ) can only blindly perform cleanup works. As you are providing general purposed callbacks, who knows what scenarios extensions would do, so it’s better to provide more information to callbacks. IMO, letting end_extra_stats() know current situation (normal or failure, even error code) is very meaningful. For example, my extension may want to log “I am forced to quite due to outside error” or “I am done successfully” in end_extra_stats(). Anyway, that’s my own opinion. If you and Michael still consider that’s not a problem, I won’t argue more.

Thanks for explaining. If there is a good use-case to add more detail to the “end” callback, it’s not very obvious yet. Maybe in the future, there will be a convincing reason to do so. 

When we hit the clean-up code on any “error”, it should be accompanied by an error log. That is 
done in all cases inside pgstat.c, and I expect an extension to log the error as well. 


--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: