Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends

> Another random thought: I worry that the dshash approach might be quite a
> bit slower, and IIUC we just need to map an integer to a string.  Maybe we
> should just use a DSA for LWLockTrancheNames. IOW we'd leave it as a char**
> but put it in shared memory.

To use DSA just for this purpose, we would need to maintain an array of
dsa_pointers that reference the string(s), right? I am not clear what you
mean by using dsa to put the char**

--
Sami