Re: Conflicting updates of command progress
От | Sami Imseih |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Conflicting updates of command progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA5RZ0s_Hta6PWDwY9Lf-c+14F+C13BK2ax=B6R7bmDNhN6xdQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Conflicting updates of command progress (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Conflicting updates of command progress
Re: Conflicting updates of command progress |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> While working on [1] I realized that some field of pg_stat_progress_cluste has > weird value. Is there a repro that you can share that shows the weird values? It sounds like the repro is on top of [1]. Is that right? > AFAICS the current design does not consider that one progress-reporting > command can be called by another one. pgstat_progress_start_command should only be called once by the entry point for the command. In theory, we could end up in a situation where start_command is called multiple times during the same top-level command; > Not sure what the correct fix is. We can > either ignore update requests from the "nested" commands, or display the There is a pattern where we do ``` if (progress) pgstat_progress_update_param ``` cluster_rel can pass down a flag to index_build or others that update progress to not report progress. Therefore, only the top level command is updating progress. what do you think? [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5117/ -- Sami Imseih Amazon Web Services (AWS)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: