Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1LxEwP=kr_t3TPxHjXcd+TzyhnHruNj22kXHqYJEePDdA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 10:07 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
>
> I also still think that _worker shouldn't be part of any of the naming
> here.
>

Okay, the other options that comes to mind for this are:
pg_subscription_replication_error, or
pg_subscription_lreplication_error, or pg_subscription_lrep_error? We
can use similar naming at another place (view) if required.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats