On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Robert Haas <
robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> exec_stmt_execsql is called by exec_stmt_open and exec_stmt_forc.
> Those are cursor operations and thus - I think - parallelism can't be
> used there.
Right, but it also gets called from exec_stmt where a parallel-safe
statement could be passed to it. So it seems to me that we
should enable parallelism for that path in code.