Re: [HACKERS] wait events for disk I/O
| От | Amit Kapila | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] wait events for disk I/O | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1Lj+m_R0ax0Ktog9ZtJtg7KP3XKNwf9hkm4TwN4RfuYvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] wait events for disk I/O (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: [HACKERS] wait events for disk I/O | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sure, if you think both Writes and Reads at OS level can have some >> chance of blocking in obscure cases, then we should add a wait event >> for them. > > I think writes have a chance of blocking in cases even in cases that > are not very obscure at all. > Point taken for writes, but I think in general we should have some criteria based on which we can decide whether to have a wait event for a particular call. It should not happen that we have tons of wait events and out of which, only a few are helpful in most of the cases in real-world scenarios. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: