Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1LgV7GHcByxLj9hdyWW1tQ5LZ+ssZVCmtQ_ktQOKV9Rfw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think this thread is pretty short on evidence that would let us make
>> a smart decision about what to do here.  I see three possibilities.
>> The first is that this patch is a good idea whether we do something
>> about the issue of half-dead pages or not.  The second is that this
>> patch is a good idea if we do something about the issue of half-dead
>> pages but a bad idea if we don't.  The third is that this patch is a
>> bad idea whether or not we do anything about the issue of half-dead
>> pages.
>

+1.  I think we can track the stats from
IndexBulkDeleteResult->pages_free to see the impact of the patch.


> Half-dead pages are not really relevant to this discussion, AFAICT. I
> think that both you and Simon mean "recyclable" pages.
>

Yes, I think so and I think that is just confusion about terminology.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amin Fallahi
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Oblivious nested loop join algorithm
Следующее
От: Kohei KaiGai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: [HACKERS] Steps inside ExecEndGather)