Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1LgQkB=3vu7c6mbBP15L3L4hhN7Atc_4qgJ88a6riMq+Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 10:15 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 4:23 PM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > IMO there's not much reason for the leader not to participate. For
> > regular queries the leader may be doing useful stuff (essentially
> > running the non-parallel part of the query) but AFAIK for VAUCUM that's
> > not the case and the worker is not doing anything.
>
> I agree, and said the same thing in
> http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmob7JLrngeHz6i60_TqdvE1YBcvGYVoEQ6_xvP=vN7DwGg@mail.gmail.com
>
> I really don't know why we have that code.
>

We have removed that code from the main patch.  It is in a separate
patch and used mainly for development testing where we want to
debug/test the worker code.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Add basic TAP tests for psql's tab-completion logic.
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.