Re: Parallel grouping sets

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Parallel grouping sets
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1L_T=4FVQ58rOFjoBLkGq2yvGRGG-CemsJX01PHExU4fg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel grouping sets  (Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io>)
Ответы Re: Parallel grouping sets
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 2:23 PM Richard Guo <riguo@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> I realized that there are two patches in this thread that are
> implemented according to different methods, which causes confusion.
>

Both the idea seems to be different.  Is the second approach [1]
inferior for any case as compared to the first approach?  Can we keep
both approaches for parallel grouping sets, if so how?  If not, then
won't the code by the first approach be useless once we commit second
approach?


[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAN_9JTwtTTnxhbr5AHuqVcriz3HxvPpx1JWE--DCSdJYuHrLtA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Georgios Kokolatos
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Duplicate Workers entries in some EXPLAIN plans
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online checksums patch - once again