On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>> ..
..
>> Why an extra parenthesis in above case whereas not in below case? I
>> think the code will look consistent if you follow the same coding
>> practice. I suggest don't use it unless you need it.
>
> That is because in the 1st case, there are multiple operators (*, +)
> whereas in the 2nd case we have just one(*). So, just to ensure that
> '*' is performed before '+', i had used parenthesis, though it is not
> required as '*' has higher precedence than '+'. I have removed the
> extra parenthesis and attached is the new version of patch. Thanks.
>
Your latest patch looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com