Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1LJMkFGHeqqCnCoF80vbUed=ZPXQAhyPYhZpuHFjBNnsQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:14 AM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 18:16, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have reproduced the issue by defining MaxAllocSize as 10240000 and
> > then during debugging, skipped the check related to LAZY_ALLOC_TUPLES.
> > After patch, it fixes the problem for me.  I have slightly modified
> > your patch to define the macros on the lines of existing macros
> > TXID_SNAPSHOT_SIZE and TXID_SNAPSHOT_MAX_NXIP.  What do you think
> > about it?
>
> Thank you for updating the patch. Yeah MAXDEADTUPLES is better than
> what I did in the previous version patch.
>

Pushed after making the change suggested by Dilip.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Increase psql's password buffer size
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number