On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:37 PM John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > + In addition, extensions may have additional types.
> > >
> > > How about: "In addition, background workers registered by extensions
> > > may have additional types."?
> >
> > Sounds good to me -- I've included this language.
> >
>
> LGTM. I will wait for a day or so, if nobody has any comments, I will
> push your patch.
>
Pushed, thanks for working on this.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com