Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1LBbGkyDPOYN+udbdU2fXvH-v_skMf8yfJX7Cg6FJFvyQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:24 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do you have something else in mind?
>

I am planning to commit the comments change patch attached in the
above email [1] next week sometime (probably Monday or Tuesday) unless
you have something more to add?


[1] -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2BRL7c_s%3D%2BTwAE6DJ1MmupbEiGCFLt97US%2BDMm6UxAjTA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Следующее
От: Amul Sul
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY