On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Attached patch fix_markbufdirty_hash_index_v1.patch fixes the problem
>> by calling MarkBufferDirty at the appropriate place in the code.
>> However, I noticed that we might end up calling MarkBufferDirty twice
>> for metapage in _hash_addovflpage. I think we can easily avoid that
>> as is done in patch fix_markbufdirty_hash_index_v1.1.patch.
>
> IIUC, the v1 patch is fixing a bug, but the v1.1 patch is a minor
> optimization.
>
Yes.
> I'm going to take the easy way out and push v1 to v10
> and master.
>
Okay.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com