On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 8:18 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
>
> > * The seeming bug in v10 suggests that we aren't testing large enough
> > logical-decoding cases, or at least aren't noticing leaks in that
> > area. I'm not sure what a good design is for testing that. I'm not
> > thrilled with just using a larger (and slower) test case, but it's
> > not clear to me how else to attack it.
> >
>
> It is not clear to me either at this stage, but I think we can decide
> that after chasing the issue in v10. My current plan is to revert
> this test and make a note of the memory leak problem found (probably
> track in Older Bugs section of PostgreSQL 12 Open Items).
>
Pushed the revert and added an open item in the 'Older Bugs' section
of PostgreSQL 12 Open Items [1].
[1] - https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com