Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1L5UtH1DMQVmGW4t0jfeBTexjyi=wSW2+3-kOKjBFArzg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1.  How about changing the description of
>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes,
>> limited by max_parallel_workers"?
>
> Thanks for looking.
>
> Seems more accurate to say that it's "taken from
> max_parallel_workers", maybe.
>

I thought of saying similar to what we have in docs, however the way
you have written works for me.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] BRIN de-summarize ranges