On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd think about adjusting the comments the proper way for each AM so
>> as one can read those comments and catch any limitation immediately.
>> The fact this has not been pointed out on this thread before any
>> checks and the many mails exchanged on the matter on this thread make
>> me think that the current code does not outline the current code
>> properties appropriately.
>
> Another thing that we could consider as well is adding an assertion in
> XLogRegisterBuffer & friends so as the combination of REGBUF_STANDARD
> and REGBUF_NO_IMAGE is forbidden. That's bugging me as well.
>
Is that related to this patch? If not, then maybe we can discuss it
in a separate thread.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers