Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I'd like to propose to keep the backward compatibility fully for s_s_names
>> (i.e., both "standby_list" and "N (standby_list)" mean the priority method)
>> at the first commit, then continue discussing this and change it if we reach
>> the consensus until PostgreSQL 10 is actually released. Thought?
>
> +1 on that.
>

+1.  That is the safest option to proceed.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com