Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Okay, but isn't it better that we remove the snapshot taken
> > at checkpoint time in the main branch or till where this code is
> > getting back-patched.   Do you see any need of same after
> > having the logging of snapshot in bgwriter?
>
> But this one is necessary as well to allow hot standby faster to
> initialize, no? Particularly in the case where a bgwriter snapshot
> would have been taken just before the checkpoint, there may be up to
> 15s until the next one.
>