On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 8:23 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks, I can take care of this before committing. The v9-0001* looks
> > good to me as well, so, I am planning to commit that tomorrow unless I
> > see more comments or any objection to that.
>
> I would like to thank both Masahiko and yourself for working on this.
> It's important.
>
> > There is still pending
> > work related to moving parallel vacuum code to a separate file and a
> > few other pending comments that are still under discussion. We can
> > take care of those in subsequent patches. Do, let me know if you or
> > others think differently?
>
> I'm +1 on moving it into a new file. I think that that division makes
> perfect sense. It will make the design of parallel VACUUM easier to
> understand.
>
Agreed and thanks for your support.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.