Re: Parallel Seq Scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KcY3d1MQcQK6y5u=KUNtP2Vvywy4RCQ8zEC8Vx33XTLw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think main reason of the leak in workers seems to be due the reason
> > that one of the buffer used while sending tuples (in function
> > BuildRemapInfo)
> > from worker to master is not getting freed and it is allocated for each
> > tuple worker sends back to master.  I couldn't find use of such a buffer,
> > so I think we can avoid the allocation of same or atleast we need to free
> > it.  Attached patch remove_unused_buf_allocation_v1.patch should fix the
> > issue.
>
> Thanks, that patch (as committed) has fixed the problem for me.  
>

Thanks to you as well for verification.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: vacuumdb sentence