Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KavSbVdk9OeQDV5yc0FVy_rFTam5HPozqYSoM=a=8hXg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 6:53 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > But the non-idiomatic locking of pg_partitioned_table appears to > continue to be the pain point of this patch. My impression is that > using a lock is the wrong approach to solve the concurrency problem. > Maybe we can use a ConditionVariable instead somehow. (The real trick > here is to figure out exactly _how_ to use the CV, I mean what exactly > is the condition that the CV sleeps on?) > Can we fix this problem by having a check at the time of CREATESUBSCRIPTION such that, if copy-data is true, then we ensure that the specified publishers don't have a foreign table? We have a somewhat similar check for publications in the function check_publications_origin(), though for a different purpose. Along with it, we can still have a check during foreign table creation/attach that it doesn't become part of some publication, as the patch may have it now. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: