On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:03 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 5.
> +defGetMinApplyDelay(DefElem *def)
> +{
> + char *input_string;
> + int result;
> + const char *hintmsg;
> +
> + input_string = defGetString(def);
> +
> + /*
> + * Parse given string as parameter which has millisecond unit
> + */
> + if (!parse_int(input_string, &result, GUC_UNIT_MS, &hintmsg))
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> + errmsg("invalid value for parameter \"%s\": \"%s\"",
> + "min_apply_delay", input_string),
> + hintmsg ? errhint("%s", _(hintmsg)) : 0));
> +
> + /*
> + * Check both the lower boundary for the valid min_apply_delay range and
> + * the upper boundary as the safeguard for some platforms where INT_MAX is
> + * wider than int32 respectively. Although parse_int() has confirmed that
> + * the result is less than or equal to INT_MAX, the value will be stored
> + * in a catalog column of int32.
> + */
> + if (result < 0 || result > PG_INT32_MAX)
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> + errmsg("%d ms is outside the valid range for parameter \"%s\" (%d .. %d)",
> + result,
> + "min_apply_delay",
> + 0, PG_INT32_MAX)));
> +
> + return result;
> +}
>
> 5a.
> Since there are no translator considerations here why not write the
> first error like:
>
> errmsg("invalid value for parameter \"min_apply_delay\": \"%s\"",
> input_string)
>
> ~
>
> 5b.
> Since there are no translator considerations here why not write the
> second error like:
>
> errmsg("%d ms is outside the valid range for parameter
> \"min_apply_delay\" (%d .. %d)",
> result, 0, PG_INT32_MAX))
>
I see that existing usage in the code matches what the patch had
before this comment. See below and similar usages in the code.
if (start <= 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("invalid value for parameter \"%s\": %d",
"start", start)));
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.