Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:40 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:50:37 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> > In my opinion, it is fine to replace the Assert with an ERROR.
>
> Sorry for posting multiple times in a row, but I'm a bit unceratin
> whether we should use FATAL or ERROR for this situation. The stream is
> not provided by user, and the session or process cannot continue.
>

I think ERROR should be fine here similar to other cases in worker.c.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.