On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:56 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I had a look at the patch 0001.
>
> It looks OK to me, but here are a couple of comments:
>
> ======
>
> 1. Is this fix intended for PG16?
>
Yes.
> I found some mention of this GUC old name lurking in the release v16 notes [1].
>
That should be changed as well but we can do that as a separate patch
just for v16.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.