Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch)
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KGWLMpBnksj-kTGPOciq=HqaNxCJAgnj28s1NB4yuaNA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch)  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch)  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:31 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> The patch for vacuum conflicts with recent changes in vacuum. So I've
> attached rebased one.
>

+ /*
+ * Next, accumulate buffer usage.  (This must wait for the workers to
+ * finish, or we might get incomplete data.)
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < nworkers; i++)
+ InstrAccumParallelQuery(&lps->buffer_usage[i]);
+

This should be done for launched workers aka
lps->pcxt->nworkers_launched.  I think a similar problem exists in
create index related patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Следующее
От: 曾文旌
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables