Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KFgWGL2XBEyONpYap0trc-Q2rFEe_K-SJhoK+AZ=bebA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:53 PM Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> For small indexes also, we gained some performance by parallel vacuum.
>

Thanks for doing all these tests.  It is clear with this and previous
tests that this patch has benefit in wide variety of cases.  However,
we should try to see some worst cases as well.  For example, if there
are multiple indexes on a table and only one of them is large whereas
all others are very small say having a few 100 or 1000 rows.

Note: Please don't use the top-posting style to reply.  Here, we use
inline reply.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Гурам Дука
Дата:
Сообщение: [PATCH] Fix PostgreSQL server build and install problems under MSYS2
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)