Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1Jze_9pO9Nd9WUeBVEUbKL4yjVcrSS9u5KYizTHPZ_+Ag@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> In terms of this project overall, NumLWLocks() now knows about only
> four categories of stuff: fixed lwlocks, backend locks (proc.c),
> replication slot locks, and locks needed by extensions.  I think it'd
> probably be fine to move the backend locks into PGPROC directly, and
> the replication slot locks into ReplicationSlot.
>

IIdus has written a patch to move backend locks into PGPROC which
I am reviewing and will do performance tests once he responds to
my review comments and I have written a patch to move replication
slot locks into ReplicationSlot which is attached with this mail.



With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format
Следующее
От: Shay Rojansky
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly?