Re: Parallel copy

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Parallel copy
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1JsVc_vyQPmraod3vpyWgP9mfyvV56OOd94zq8jdUNPqg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel copy  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:16 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh and Bharath,
>
> Seems like the Parallel Copy patch is regarding RI_TRIGGER_PK as
> parallel-unsafe.
> Can you explain why this is?
>

I don't think we need to restrict this case and even if there is some
reason to do so then probably the same should be mentioned in the
comments.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matthieu Garrigues
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Следующее
От: Kasahara Tatsuhito
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process