Re: doc review for parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: doc review for parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1JoYKBcAJ5sgvbwGFwyu1Jr6faQqa8nn8tQuuewmpXs-Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: doc review for parallel vacuum  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Ответы Re: doc review for parallel vacuum
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:16 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> Also, this part still doesn't read well:
>
> -        * amvacuumcleanup to the DSM segment if it's the first time to get it?
> -        * from them? because they? allocate it locally and it's possible that an
> -        * index will be vacuumed by the different vacuum process at the next
>
> If you change "it" and "them" and "it" and say "*a* different", then it'll be
> ok.
>

I am not sure if I follow how exactly you want to change it but still
let me know what you think about if we change it like: "Copy the index
bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to
the DSM segment if it's the first time because they allocate locally
and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by the different
vacuum process at the next time."

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.
Следующее
От: Yugo NAGATA
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance