On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:25:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> >> Okay, I'll change this in back branches and HEAD to keep the code
> >> consistent, or do you think it is better to retain the order in HEAD
> >> as it is and just change it for back-branches?
> >
> > As I said, I'd keep the natural ordering in HEAD.
>
> Yes, please keep the items in an alphabetical order on HEAD, and just
> have the new item at the bottom of the enum in the back-branches.
> That's the usual practice.
>
Okay, I have back-patched the change till v11 because before that
REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INTERNAL_SPEC_ABORT is already at the end.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.