Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1JcQ36FT0+iS9mEtx-s4Ss=c30Wb+5gAo1n6FHyf_qP6Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 8:12 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:32 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I missed to do the test for streaming.  I will to that tomorrow and reply back.
>
> For streaming transactions this issue is not there. Because this
> problem will only occur if the last change is *SPEC INSERT * and after
> that there is no other UPDATE/INSERT change because on that change we
> are resetting the toast table.  Now, if the transaction has only *SPEC
> INSERT* without SPEC CONFIRM or any other INSERT/UPDATE then we will
> not stream it.  And if we get any next INSERT/UPDATE then only we can
> select this for stream but in that case toast will be reset.  So as of
> today for streaming mode we don't have this problem.
>

What if the next change is a different SPEC_INSERT
(REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INTERNAL_SPEC_INSERT)? I think in that case we
will stream but won't free the toast memory.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuro Yamada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Duplicate history file?
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory