On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 7:20 PM Markus Wanner
<markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 31.03.21 15:18, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:55 AM Markus Wanner
> >> The last sentences there now seems to relate to just the setting of
> >> "concurrent_abort", rather than the whole reason to invoke the
> >> prepare_cb. And the reference to the "gid" is a bit lost. Maybe:
> >>
> >> "Thus even in case of a concurrent abort, enough information is
> >> provided to the output plugin for it to properly deal with the
> >> <command>ROLLBACK PREPARED</command> once that is decoded."
> >
> > Okay, Changed the patch accordingly.
>
> That's fine with me.
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.