On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Guilherme Pereira <guiperpt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having a strange situation, where adding extra parallel workers
> (max_parallel_workers_per_gather), the planner chooses a different plan,
I think I can see what is going on here. The planner chooses a
different plan because the cost of that plan
(cost=1001.10..31949141.56) is cheap as compared to the original plan
(cost=31676816.72..32928717.16)
> with nested loops, which makes the query twice as slow.
It is slow because it needs to transmit many rows (rows=23845842) from
workers to master backend.
> Strangely with the
> COUNT_DISTINCT implementation from Tomas Vondra
> (https://github.com/tvondra/count_distinct) it scales nicely (almost
> linearly) with the workers.
>
The main difference is that count_distinct is a parallel_safe
aggregate function which can be allowed to push down to workers which
in turn lead to very few rows (rows=9) being transferred from workers
to master backend.
I think ideally it should not have picked the plan which leads to
transmitting so many rows, but the cost turns out to be lesser.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com