Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error?
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1JF-0ufA0e3ssG2vs1a5YvuDnWnBexj1v_K2WF2Q3xBNA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:13 PM Daniel Westermann <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I believe this should raise an error or at least a warning?
>>
>
> Sure, if we want we can raise the error or warning for this, but this is a parameter mainly to test zheap with
existingset of regression tests.  I am not sure if we want to keep it or even if we want to have any such parameter for
testingpurpose in what form it will be present.  So, adding more checks at this stage around this parameter doesn't
seemadvisable to me. 
>

Instead of starting new threads for each report, it might be better to
report it on the zheap thread [1].

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2BYtM5vxzSM2NZm%2BpC37MCwyvtkmJrO_yRBQeZDp9Wa2w%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error?
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench doc fix