Re: [HACKERS] COPY (query) TO ... doesn't allow parallelism

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-06-01 21:23:04 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On a related note, I think it might be better to have an
>> IsInParallelMode() check in this case as we have at other places.
>> This is to ensure that if this command is invoked via plpgsql function
>> and that function runs is the parallel mode, it will act as a
>> safeguard.
>
> Hm? Which other places do it that way?  Isn't standard_planner()
> centralizing such a check?
>

heap_insert->heap_prepare_insert, heap_update, heap_delete, etc.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com