Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+xd30Knn-iExiejNNvZLq9PJ6uyvqDacDrL=zgiUnWmg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 6:42 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-Sep-10, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:03 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> > The comments already say what you said in the second suggestion:"The
> > caller must rely on timestamp stored in *ts iff the function returns
> > true.". Read iff "as if and only if"
>
> I think "must" should be "may" there, if we're nitpicking.
>

Here, we want to say that "caller can rely on *ts only if the function
returns true". If we replace 'must' with 'may' then it seems to me we
are trying to say that caller can ignore the timestamp value, if so,
why at first place caller has called this function.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2