On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think it is a bad idea to print additional information as you
> are suggesting but why only for this error? It could be useful to
> investigate any other error we get during decoding. I think normally
> we add such additional information via error_context. We have recently
> added/enhanced it for apply-workers, see commit [1].
>
> I think here we should just print the relation name in the error
> message you pointed out and then work on adding additional information
> via error context as a separate patch. What do you think?
>
Attached please find the patch which just modifies the current error
message as proposed by you. I am planning to commit it in a day or two
unless there are comments or any other suggestions.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.