On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:01 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 6:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with you that specifying XID could be easier and
> > understandable for users. I was thinking and studying a bit about what
> > other systems do in this regard. Why don't we try to provide conflict
> > resolution methods for users? The idea could be that either the
> > conflicts can be resolved automatically or manually. In the case of
> > manual resolution, users can use the existing methods or the XID stuff
> > you are proposing here and in case of automatic resolution, the
> > in-built or corresponding user-defined functions will be invoked for
> > conflict resolution. There are more details to figure out in the
> > automatic resolution scheme but I see a lot of value in doing the
> > same.
>
> Yeah, I also see a lot of value in automatic conflict resolution. But
> maybe we can have both ways? For example, in case where the user wants
> to resolve conflicts in different ways or a conflict that cannot be
> resolved by automatic resolution (not sure there is in practice
> though), the manual resolution would also have value.
>
Right, that is exactly what I was saying. So, even if both can be done
as separate patches, we should try to design the manual resolution in
a way that can be extended for an automatic resolution system. I think
we can try to have some initial idea/design/POC for an automatic
resolution as well to ensure that the manual resolution scheme can be
further extended.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.