Re: Parallel Seq Scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+exO1qkwu8PQYeisjXiM8yML0CjVtRuHhxMfS8dHo+xA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And also regarding the number of workers (16) that is shown in the
> > explain analyze plan are not actually allotted because the in my
> > configuration i set the max_worker_process as 8 only. I feel the plan
> > should show the allotted workers not the planned workers.
> > If the query execution takes time because of lack of workers and the
> > plan is showing as 16 workers, in that case user may think that
> > even with 16 workers the query is slower, but actually it is not.
>
> I would expect EXPLAIN should show the # of workers planned, and
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE should show both the planned and actual values.
>

Sounds sensible, will look into doing that way.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] 答复:[HACKERS] 答复:[HACKERS] about fsync in CLOG buffer write