Re: WAL usage calculation patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1+dhq1hdJo+tmf0CyDBhWV1H0dTWbEDio-cMk=10BDtTA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL usage calculation patch  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:06 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 6:41 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 4.
> > /* # of WAL full page image generated */
> > Can we change it to "/* # of WAL full page image records generated */"?
>
> IMHO, "# of WAL full-page image records" seems like the number of wal
> record which contains the full-page image.
>

I think this resembles what you have written here.

>  But, actually, this is the
> total number of the full-page images, not the number of records that
> have a full-page image.
>

We count this when forming WAL records.  As per my understanding, all
three counters are about WAL records.  This counter tells how many
records have full page images and one of the purposes of having this
counter is to check what percentage of records contain full page
image.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.