On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:26 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:40:11AM +0000, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 6:05 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To ensure that restart_lsn has been moved to a recent position, we need to log
> > > XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS and make sure the same is processed as well by
> > > walsender. The attached patch does the required change.
> > >
> > > Hou-San can reproduce this problem by adding additional checkpoints in the
> > > test and after applying the attached it fixes the problem. Now, this patch is
> > > mostly based on the theory we formed based on LOGs on BF and a reproducer
> > > by Hou-San, so still, there is some chance that this doesn't fix the BF failures in
> > > which case I'll again look into those.
> >
> > I have verified that the patch can fix the issue on my machine(after adding few
> > more checkpoints before slot invalidation test.) I also added one more check in
> > the test to confirm the synced slot is not temp slot. Here is the v2 patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> +# To ensure that restart_lsn has moved to a recent WAL position, we need
> +# to log XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS and make sure the same is processed as well
> +$primary->psql('postgres', "CHECKPOINT");
>
> Instead of "CHECKPOINT" wouldn't a less heavy "SELECT pg_log_standby_snapshot();"
> be enough?
>
Yeah, that would be enough. However, the test still fails randomly due
to the same reason. See [1]. So, as mentioned yesterday, now, I feel
it is better to recreate the subscription/slot so that it can get the
latest restart_lsn rather than relying on pg_log_standby_snapshot() to
move it.
> Not a big deal but maybe we could do the change while modifying
> 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl in the next patch "Add a new slotsync worker".
>
Right, we can do that or probably this test would have made more sense
with a worker patch where we could wait for the slot to be synced.
Anyway, let's try to recreate the slot/subscription idea. BTW, do you
think that adding a LOG when we are not able to sync will help in
debugging such problems? I think eventually we can change it to DEBUG1
but for now, it can help with stabilizing BF and or some other
reported issues.
[1] - https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skink&dt=2024-02-15%2000%3A14%3A38
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.