On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Robert Haas <
robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Amit Kapila <
amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <
robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <
amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections
> >> > instead of parallel connections?
> >>
> >> I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> >>Maybe "simultaneous"?
> >
> > Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?
>
> multiple isn't right, but we could say concurrent.
I also find concurrent more appropriate.
Dilip, could you please change it to concurrent in doc updates,
variables, functions unless you see any objection for the same.